You wake up in Heaven. God, it turns out, is a cricket fan, and wants to combine the auctions, concentration of talent, and spectacle of the IPL with the qualities of first-class cricket and the history of the County Championship.
Eight counties – the six that currently host a Test ground, plus Hampshire and Durham who have previously hosted Tests and aren’t Glamorgan – have been chosen to compete. The rules are as follows:
- This is an all-time squad, so everyone is eligible.
- To preserve a link between the county and the new team, counties are allowed to draft their best historic players before the competition starts. This ensures we don’t end up with Boycott playing for Lancashire. However, I limited this to players with at least some Test experience. I was slightly more generous with recent players who I have seen myself – I feel better equipped to judge Graham Onions than someone who took as many wickets 90 years ago.
- In line with IPL rules (rather than County Championship rules), teams are allowed four overseas players. This both significantly improves the quality of the competition and also provides a huge advantage to the team who picks first and gets Bradman. (I was tempted to exclude Bradman on that basis, but it wouldn’t be the true pinnacle of cricket without him).
- There is no “budget”, instead teams make draft picks in an order based on how many picks them have left, with selection “snaking” (i.e. when everyone has had a turn, the team who picked last gets to pick first next time round) to minimise the advantage of going first.
I owe a big debt of gratitude to fellow autistic cricket blogger AspiBlog, and his all-time county XIs like this one for Yorkshire. That being said, the flaws in my teams are entirely my own. In hindsight, I should have worked a bit harder to find players who didn’t meet AspiBlog’s criteria for all-time XIs (which valued excellent first-class records at one county more highly than I do), but did meet my criteria. David Gower, Shane Warne and Kyle Abbott at Hampshire are prime examples, as is Richard Hadlee at Nottinghamshire – unfortunately I didn’t think of that line of enquiry until I’d already done the draft.
Anyway, here are my teams.
Yorkshire: Boycott, Sutcliffe, Hutton, Root, Leyland, Rhodes, J. Bairstow (wk), Hadlee, Vaas, Trueman, Verity
Yorkshire has the highest proportion of “legacy” players. Three world-class openers (Hutton at three because he seems to have been the most rounded player), one of England’s greatest middle-order batsmen, two fine all-rounders, a leading English keeper-batsman, one of the great pre-war spinners, and Fred Trueman, arguably the greatest English fast bowler. This surplus of domestic talent meant that they only got to pick their extra players at quite a late stage, but managed to secure two extra seamers to round out their attack. Both Hadlee and Vaas were reasonable batters, giving this side huge depth. Trueman’s ferocity, Hadlee’s mastery of swing, and Vaas’ metronymic left arm will complement each other very nicely.
Surrey: Hobbs, J. Edrich, Barrington, Thorpe, May, Jardine, Stewart (wk), K. Miller, Ashwin, Bedser, Steyn
Another side rich in legacy batting talent. Hobbs was an elite opener, and Edrich, while not on that level, was still firmly world-class. Barrington is possibly the most dogged #3 England have ever had, even if he wasn’t as exciting to watch as Hammond or Compton. The middle order is strong, if slightly unexceptional, with Jardine being one of England’s greatest captains, and Stewart is an Edrich-level opener whose Test career was undermined by him regularly having to keep wicket. Keith Miller is a ridiculous selection at #8 that is only possible because a lot of teams couldn’t quite make room for him, and Ashwin is far too good a batsman to be at #9 (while also being one of the greatest spinners in history). Bedser is a legacy pick, but one of England’s great fast-mediums who fully warrants a selection, while Steyn rounds out the team with elite top pace.
Lancashire: Washbrook, Atherton, Paynter, S. Smith, Lloyd, De Villiers (wk), Flintoff, Briggs, Barnes, Statham, Anderson
Only two players – Smith and De Villiers – are drafted. Clive Lloyd gets in as a genuine Lancashire player, the first but not the last overseas player to be selected for their county.
Washbrook and Atherton are the two weakest openers so far, but will aim to set a good foundation for an incredible middle order. Paynter is underrated in discussions of great England batsmen due to his small sample size (his Test record far outstrips his first-class record). Steve Smith, if anything, is underrated due to anti-recency bias. Lloyd is one of the greatest captains ever, and De Villiers is the rare example of a world-class batsman whose average didn’t drop when he had the gloves, making him a great choice at 6. This allows me to fit in not just Freddie Flintoff, but all three of Sydney Barnes (statistically the closest thing to the Bradman of bowling), Brian Statham (ferocious seamer), and Jimmy Anderson (leading Test wicket taking fast bowler, ageing like fine wine). Johnny Briggs provides the spin option – I am cautious about including spinners from the era of uncovered pitches, and maybe someone like Saqlain Mushtaq would have been a better selection.
Warwickshire: Amiss, Hayden, Trott, Dexter, Kallis, Bell, Prior (wk), Dev, Snow, L. Gibbs, Willis.
OK, there’s an obvious issue here: I forgot Chris Woakes. This caused Warwickshire to get a better draft placement, and also caused them to spend their second pick on Kapil Dev, who is exactly the same sort of player as Woakes. Unfortunately, fixing that oversight (like most oversights of that nature) would mean redoing the draft, and I don’t want to do that.
Amiss, Trott, Bell, Willis, and West Indian spinner Lance Gibbs are the only legacy selections. They’re joined by South African batting all-rounder Kallis (the fourth pick in the entire draft), Indian bowling all-rounder Dev, and Australian opening batsman Hayden. Ted Dexter, Matt Prior, and Jon Snow are the first domestic players to be drafted for a county.
You could quibble a bit about the batting order. I chose to notionally list Dexter above Kallis so that Kallis could get a break after bowling. If Warwickshire were batting first, conversely, then Kallis would probably go out at four. I also should probably have selected Usman Khawaja ahead of Matthew Hayden, but Hayden being an outstanding opening batsman for his whole career earns him extra points, as opposed to Khawaja’s decade as a mediocre #3.
Nottinghamshire: Simpson, Duckett, Hammond, Gower, Sobers, Greig, Gilchrist (wk), Swann, Broad, Larwood, McGrath
If you’re thinking, “wow, how did Nottinghamshire manage to draft such a great team?” – yeah, you’re right to think that. I remembered Ben Duckett existed midway through the draft and retroactively awarded him to them, after they had already use the second draft pick to select Adam Gilchrist.
Their legacy players are Duckett, Swann, Broad, Larwood, and the great West Indian all-rounder Garfield Sobers, who otherwise would have been a strong contender (alongside Gilchrist) for the second person to be drated after Bradman. Graeme Swann is the greatest English spinner of the last 50 years, Stuart Broad is a top-class seamer, and Ben Duckett is… OK, it’s not been long since he got back in the England team, but he’s done very well. Harold Larwood, of course, is practically synonymous with high-pace aggressive bowling.
Sobers aside, their overseas players are three Australians – Bob Simpson, Gilchrist, and Glenn McGrath. Simpson is underrated, McGrath is not.
The team is rounded out by some excellent domestic drafts. Wally Hammond is probably the greatest English batsman, David Gower is very good, and Tony Greig is arguably a better all-rounder than Botham. I think Notts win the prize for best drafting.
Hampshire: Trescothick, Gooch, Bradman, Pietersen, R. Smith, A. Flower (wk), Imran Khan, Woakes, Marshall, Laker, Tyson
Only three legacy picks: Pietersen, Robin Smith, and the West Indian seamer Malcolm Marshall (arguably the greatest seam bowler of all time). That granted them the first draft pick, and there should be no surprise about who they picked. Added to Bradman and Marshall are two other elite overseas players, wicketkeeper Andy Flower and all-rounder Imran Khan, who honestly could have switched batting positions easily. Spinner Jim Laker was the first domestic player to be drafted for any team. An attack of Khan, Marshall, and Laker would be terrifying in its own right – now imagine the terrifying sight of Frank Tyson at first change, and Chris Woakes in English conditions at second change.
This team would win the championship, no doubt, even if the English batting options are fairly weak.
Durham: Gavaskar, Cook, G. Pollock, Tendulkar, Stokes, Collingwood, Knott (wk), Warne, Wood, Harmison, Onions
All five of Durham’s legacy players are 21st century players, and four of them are seamers. This inevitably shapes their side. There is no need for seamers or all-rounders, allowing them to focus their draft picks on elite batting options, an elite spinner, and Alan Knott to keep wicket.
Sunil Gavaskar is their first draft pick because elite openers are in high demand (Yorkshire hoarded them), and he’s joined as a foreign player by countryman Sachin Tendulkar, South Africa’s Graeme Pollock, and Australian spinner Shane Warne. The team is rounded out by Alistair Cook – a very astute pick, as the best English opener who isn’t a legacy selection. Finally, Knott is one of the better pre-Gilchrist keeper-batsmen, although not on the level of the Englishman selected by Middlesex.
Middlesex: Strauss, Haynes, Headley, D. Compton, Hendren, Botham, Ames, Akram, Emburey, Fraser, Ambrose
Legacy players: Strauss, Compton, Hendren, Emburey, Fraser, and West Indian Desmond Haynes. All fine players. Fraser wouldn’t have been my first choice as an English seamer, but isn’t an outrageous selection to round out the teams, while Emburey was a useful spinner whose career is tarnished by his decision to go on both rebel tours.
Overseas players: George Headley (a serious contender for the second greatest batsman of all time), Wasim Akram (Pakistani left-arm seamer who could bat; absolutely devastating swinger of the ball), and Curtley Ambrose (statistically up there with Marshall and Garner), and well as Haynes, a fine opener.
Domestic drafts are Botham, England’s most icnonic all-rounder who will be stunned not to be given the new ball, and Les Ames, England’s greatest ever wicket-kepper batsman.
Lessons Learned
The first and most obvious lesson is that I should have worked harder to find, for example, five legacy players for each side.
Similarly, I would probably drop Briggs and Verity from their sides. Three reasons: first, comparing spinners who played in the uncovered era to the modern day is impossible; second, because Yorkshire and Surrey didn’t need so many legacy players; and third, because it would open up two extra spots for spinners. There is no room in these sides for Murali, Anil Kumble, Saqlain Mushtaq, Abdul Qadir, Richie Benaud, Alf Valentine, Bill O’Reilly, Ravi Jadeja, BS Bedi, Daniel Vettori, or even Derek Underwood – the only drafted spinners are Warne, Laker, and Ashwin, unless you count Greig. Now there’s no world in which all of them get drafted, but there is a world where two more of them do.
On that note, perhaps I could have drafted larger squads of perhaps 15 or 16, with the substitutes being allowed to be foreign, and perhaps mandating certain other restrictions like requiring every squad to contain a spinning all-rounder, or a left-arm seamer.
I’d also like a greater variety of nations to be represented. The foreigners selected, perhaps unsurprisingly, skew towards the West Indies and Australia. There are a few Indians and South Africans, but only two Pakistanis, one Kiwi, one Sri Lankan (Vaas!) and one Zimbabwean. Larger squads would help there.
With these flaws in mind, I will probably redo this exercise one day.